What Does Health Care Reform Mean for Ins Agents?

This message was sent to the following recipients:
Representative Scalise
Senator Landrieu
Senator Vitter
President Obama
Vice President Joe Biden
Message text follows:

May 14, 2009

[recipient address was inserted here]

Dear [recipient name was inserted here],

As one of your constituents who is deeply involved in securing and
servicing affordable health insurance coverage for hundreds of employers
and individuals, I am very interested in being a constructive part of
national health care reform.

Professionally licensed health insurance agents, brokers and consultants
like myself provide valuable services to individuals and employers to
obtain prices for coverage that best fits their needs. We design benefit
plans, explain coordination issues of public and private benefits, and
solve problems that may occur once coverage is in place. We also help
design and implement cutting edge health promotion and wellness programs
for employers—a focus that everyone agrees is key to combating increasing
health care costs.

My profession is subject to rigorous licensing and continuing education
requirements and serve a proud and important role as advocates for their
clients. We help gain coverage for and service the benefit needs of
millions of Americans.

I am very concerned that some in Congress believe that agents and brokers
merely add unnecessary expense to the cost of health insurance, and that a
government-run entity can substitute for the role and value of
professional benefit specialists. However, the record clearly indicates
that government bureaucrats are ill-equipped to provide the personal
service, timely objective information, guidance and accountability that
professionally trained and licensed agents and brokers deliver on a daily
basis.

Recent evidence of the performance of two prominent government-run call
centers gives pause to the idea of entrusting government to be the best
advocate for consumers.

1-800-MEDICARE: A recent U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging hearing
and investigation on the performance of the 1-800-MEDICARE call center
identified continued numerous problems with the service given to Medicare
beneficiaries. Blatant shortcomings include: • confusing interactive
voice response menu options • unacceptably long wait times―up to
one hour during peak call periods • disconnected calls • technical and
infrastructure failures • inappropriate referrals to other programs •
jargon-filled and error-ridden scripts that are used by customer service
representatives to respond to caller inquiries • oversight inadequacies
and training deficiencies • incorrect information routinely being
dispensed by customer service representatives.

Internal Revenue Service’s Taxpayer Telephone Assistance: The IRS taxpayer
telephone assistance services continue to experience significant problems.
According to a 2008 GAO study: • the number of toll-free callers who
received busy signals or were disconnected from the IRS increased nearly
10 times over the previous year • the caller abandon rate more than
doubled over the previous year • the average speed of answer (the length
of time taxpayers wait to get their calls answered) nearly doubled from
2007, to almost nine minutes.

Whether issues involve compliance with or navigating options on state and
federal laws, regulations and issues (including tax decisions, HIPAA,
ERISA, COBRA, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Genetic
Nondiscrimination Act, etc.), professionally licensed and trained agents,
brokers and consultants are there every day as consumer advocates. They
provide peace of mind to millions of employers, workers, individuals and
families.

Though government-run call centers have a time and a place in providing
basic information and service, they cannot replace the high level of
personal service, policy knowledge and accountability that distinguishes
the professional agent, broker and consultant.

Sincerely,

Debbie Mormino
985-892-5858

Add comment May 15, 2009 thebreastdiva

We Need Your Help To Educate People!

Breast Cancer is affecting so many people these days. What we’re eating, drinking and breathing is so impoortant!

Watch this video: http://apps.facebook.com/thepinkribbon/invite.php

1 comment May 12, 2009 thebreastdiva

Minimally Invasive Alternative to Lumpectomy Reduces Risks

Novilase Treatment for Benign Breast Tumors Featured at Breast Surgeons Meeting

SAN DIEGO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–A panel at the recent meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons included discussion of the advantages of a new laser treatment for fibroadenomas, the most common form of benign breast tumor. Novilase™ Breast Therapy makes it possible to treat these non-cancerous tumors while minimizing risks and maintaining the breast’s natural shape and feel.

Among the panelists was Kambiz Dowlat, M.D., a professor of surgery at the Rush University Medical Center in Chicago. Dr. Dowlat pioneered laser treatment of small breast tumors. The procedure he developed is now performed with the Novilase™ Interstitial Laser Therapy device.

“With the X-ray guided laser technology we have today, lumpectomy is overkill,” said Dr. Dowlat. “Lumpectomy creates a significant scar and can deform the breast when you take the tumor out. Fibroadenomas can be precisely ablated with a laser, giving a superior result and less medical risk than lumpectomy. This is a great boon for patients because they can have their benign tumors treated without significant consequences for their health or appearance.”

Dr. Dowlat noted that breast health is moving toward treatments, such as Novilase, that are less invasive and have fewer side effects.

Tumors are now being detected at earlier stages when they are smaller. Because laser therapy is less intimidating for most women, the procedure provides them with a third treatment option besides surgery and a “watch and wait” approach, which may encourage them to take advantage of early detection.

Dr. Dowlat’s remarks emphasized several benefits of laser treatment over lumpectomy surgery, the traditional approach to treating fibroadenomas:

* Minimal scarring. Because no incision is made, laser treatment generally leaves only minimal scars.
* Natural shape and feel maintained. There is typically no “dimpling” with laser treatment because unlike a lumpectomy, the procedure does not remove tissue. In addition, the body’s natural healing process repairs the tumor site and restores the breast’s natural feel.
* Less risk of adverse reaction. Laser treatment can be performed using local anesthetic. A lumpectomy often requires IV sedation or a general anesthetic, which can be riskier.
* Less infection risk. The procedure involves the insertion of a laser probe and a thermal probe through two 1/8- inch skin nicks. The small size of the nicks keeps the infection risk extremely low. In contrast, a lumpectomy uses a 2 inch-to-3 inch incision, which creates a greater risk of infection.
* Faster recovery. A patient can resume normal activity within a few hours of the procedure. Recovery from a lumpectomy can take several days.

About 10 percent of all women will experience fibroadenomas during their lifetime. Although not cancerous, fibroadenomas can cause physical discomfort and also anxiety because of the association of lumps with breast cancer. Thus, after consultation with their physicians, many women with this condition request that their fibroadenomas be removed.

While Novilase is the first breast procedure to use direct laser therapy treat fibroadenomas, laser ablation has been successfully used to treat benign prostate tumors since the early 1990s. Novilase also uses the same image guidance that has been trusted for more than a decade for breast biopsy.

The Novilase device is made by Novian Health (Chicago, Ill.), a company Dr. Dowlat founded. For the initial use of the Novilase technology, Novian Health sought and received FDA 510(k) clearance for the treatment of fibroadenomas of up to and including 2 cm.

The 10th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons was held April 22-26 in San Diego.

About Novian Health

Novian Health is a Chicago-based, privately held company with proprietary technology for the treatment of tumors using Interstitial Laser Therapy. The company has developed, tested, and patented a minimally invasive procedure, Novilase Breast Therapy, which uses ILT (controlled heating) for the ablation of breast tumors. Novian Health has received its first FDA 510(k) clearance for fibroadenomas and anticipates it will commence a trial later this year in connection with seeking FDA approval for a malignant indication. Novian Health is commercializing its new technology primarily through independent breast centers, hospitals, and radiology groups, and secondarily through Novilase-branded centers of excellence in select markets.

To learn more about Novilase Breast Therapy, visit www.novianhealth.com.

Add comment May 5, 2009 thebreastdiva

Critical Alert: The Swine Flu Pandemic – Fact or Fiction?

American health officials declared a public health emergency as cases of swine flu were confirmed in the U.S. Health officials across the world fear this could be the leading edge of a global pandemic emerging from Mexico, where seven people are confirmed dead as a result of the new virus.

On Wednesday April 29th, the World Health Organization (WHO) raised its pandemic alert level to five on its six-level threat scale,1 which means they”ve determined that the virus is capable of human-to-human transmission. The initial outbreaks across North America reveal an infection already traveling at higher velocity than did the last official pandemic strain, the 1968 Hong Kong flu.

Phase 5 had never been declared since the warning system was introduced in 2005 in response to the avian influenza crisis. Phase 6 means a pandemic is under way. WHO now openly states it is not possible to contain the spread of this infection and recommends mitigation measures, not restricting travel or closing borders.

However, a pandemic does not necessarily mean what you think it does, it is NOT black-plague carts being hauled through the streets piled high with dead bodies. Nor does it mean flesh eating zombies wandering the streets feeding on the living. All a pandemic means is that a new infectious disease is spreading throughout the world.

swine fluThe number of fatalities, and suspected and confirmed cases across the world change depending on the source, so your best bet — if you want the latest numbers — is to use Google Maps” Swine Flu Tracker.

Several nations have imposed travel bans, or made plans to quarantine air travelers2 that present symptoms of the swine flu, such as:

* Fever of more than 100
* Coughing
* Runny nose and/or sore throat
* Joint aches
* Severe headache
* Vomiting and/or diarrhea
* Lethargy
* Lack of appetite

Top global flu experts are trying to predict how dangerous the new swine flu strain will be, as it became clear that they had little information about Mexico”s outbreak. It is as yet unclear how many cases occurred in the month or so before the outbreak was detected. It”s also unknown whether the virus was mutating to be more lethal, or less.

Much Fear Mongering Being Promoted

I suspect you have likely been alarmed by the media”s coverage of the swine flu scare. It has a noticeable subplot – preparing you for draconian measures to combat a future pandemic as well as forcing you to accept the idea of mandatory vaccinations.

On April 27, Time magazine published an article which discusses how dozens died and hundreds were injured from vaccines as a result of the 1976 swine flu fiasco, when the Ford administration attempted to use the infection of soldiers at Fort Dix as a pretext for a mass vaccination of the entire country.

Despite acknowledging that the 1976 farce was an example of “how not to handle a flu outbreak”, the article still introduces the notion that officials “may soon have to consider whether to institute draconian measures to combat the disease”.

Fortunately some respectable journalists recognize this and are seeking to spread a voice of reason to the fear that is being promoted in the majority of the media

WHO and CDC Pandemic Preparedness Seriously Broken

The pandemic warning system has failed as it simply doesn”t exist, even in North America and Europe. To improve the system, massive new investments in surveillance, scientific and regulatory infrastructure, basic public health, and global access to common sense interventions like vitamin D optimization are required.

According to the Washington Post, the CDC did not learn about the outbreak until six days after Mexico had begun to impose emergency measures. There should be no excuses. The paradox of this swine flu panic is that, while totally unexpected, it was accurately predicted. Six years ago, Science dedicated a major story to evidence that “after years of stability, the North American swine flu virus has jumped onto an evolutionary fasttrack”.

However, maybe this is precisely what public health authorities desire.

This is NOT the First Swine Flu Panic

My guess is that you can expect to see a lot of panic over this issue in the near future. But the key is to remain calm — this isn”t the first time the public has been warned about swine flu. The last time was in 1976, right before I entered medical school and I remember it very clearly. It resulted in the massive swine flu vaccine campaign.

Do you happen to recall the result of this massive campaign?

Within a few months, claims totaling $1.3 billion had been filed by victims who had suffered paralysis from the vaccine. The vaccine was also blamed for 25 deaths.

However, several hundred people developed crippling Guillain-Barré Syndrome after they were injected with the swine flu vaccine. Even healthy 20-year-olds ended up as paraplegics.

And the swine flu pandemic itself? It never materialized.

More People Died From the Swine Flu Vaccine than Swine Flu!

It is very difficult to forecast a pandemic, and a rash response can be extremely damaging.

As of Monday April 27, the worldwide total number of confirmed cases was 82, according to WHO, which included 40 cases in the U.S., confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control. But does that truly warrant the feverish news headlines?

To put things into perspective, malaria kills 3,000 people EVERY DAY, and it”s considered “a health problem”… But of course, there are no fancy vaccines for malaria that can rake in billions of dollars in a short amount of time.

One Australian news source,3 for example, states that even a mild swine flu epidemic could lead to the deaths of 1.4 million people and would reduce economic growth by nearly $5 trillion dollars.

Give me a break, if this doesn”t sound like the outlandish cries of the pandemic bird-flu I don”t know what does. Do you remember when President Bush said two million Americans would die as a result of the bird flu?

In 2005, in 2006, 2007, and again in 2008, those fears were exposed as little more than a cruel hoax, designed to instill fear, and line the pocketbooks of various individuals and industry. I became so convinced by the evidence AGAINST the possibility of a bird flu pandemic that I wrote a New York Times bestselling book, The Bird Flu Hoax, all about the massive fraud involved with the epidemic that never happened..

swine fluWhat is the Swine Flu?

Regular swine flu is a contagious respiratory disease, caused by a type-A influenza virus that affects pigs. The current strain, A(H1N1), is a new variation of an H1N1 virus — which causes seasonal flu outbreaks in humans — that also contains genetic material of bird and pig versions of the flu.

Interestingly enough, this version has never before been seen in neither human nor animal, which I will discuss a bit later.

This does sound bad. But not so fast. There are a few reasons to not rush to conclusions that this is the deadly pandemic we”ve been told would occur in the near future (as if anyone could predict it without having some sort of inside knowledge).

Why a True Bird- or Swine Flu Pandemic is HIGHLY Unlikely

While in my opinion it is highly likely factory farming is responsible for producing this viral strain, I believe there is still no cause for concern.

You may not know this, but all H1N1 flu”s are descendants of the 1918 pandemic strain. The reason why the flu shot may or may not work, however, from year to year, is due to mutations. Therefore, there”s no vaccine available for this current hybrid flu strain, and naturally, this is feeding the fear that millions of people will die before a vaccine can be made.

However, let me remind you of one very important fact here.

Just a couple of months ago, scientists concluded that the 1918 flu pandemic that killed between 50-100 million people worldwide in a matter of 18 months — which all these worst case scenarios are built upon — was NOT due to the flu itself!4

Instead, they discovered the real culprit was strep infections.

People with influenza often get what is known as a “superinfection” with a bacterial agent. In 1918 it appears to have been Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Since strep is much easier to treat than the flu using modern medicine, a new pandemic would likely be much less dire than it was in the early 20th century, the researchers concluded.

Others, such as evolutionary biologist Paul Ewald,5 claim that a pandemic of this sort simply cannot happen, because in order for it to occur, the world has to change. Not the virus itself, but the world.

In a previous interview for Esquire magazine, in which he discusses the possibility of a bird flu pandemic, he states:

“They think that if a virus mutates, it”s an evolutionary event. Well, the virus is mutating because that is what viruses and other pathogens do. But evolution is not just random mutation. It is random mutation coupled with natural selection; it is a battle for competitive advantage among different strains generated by random mutation.

For bird flu to evolve into a human pandemic, the strain that finds a home in humanity has to be a strain that is both highly virulent and highly transmissible. Deadliness has to translate somehow into popularity; H5N1 has to find a way to kill or immobilize its human hosts, and still find other hosts to infect. Usually that doesn”t happen.”

Ewald goes on to explain that evolution in general is all about trade-offs, and in the evolution of infections the trade-off is between virulence and transmissibility.

What this means is that in order for a “bird flu” or “swine flu” to turn into a human pandemic, it has to find an environment that favors both deadly virulence and ease of transmission.

People living in squalor on the Western Front at the end of World War I generated such an environment, from which the epidemic of 1918 could arise.

Likewise, crowded chicken farms, slaughterhouses, and jam-packed markets of eastern Asia provide another such environment, and that environment gave rise to the bird flu — a pathogen that both kills and spreads, in birds, but not in humans.

Says Ewald:

“We know that H5N1 is well adapted to birds. We also know that it has a hard time becoming a virus that can move from person to person. It has a hard time without our doing anything. But we can make it harder. We can make sure it has no human population in which to evolve transmissibility. There is no need to rely on the mass extermination of chickens. There is no need to stockpile vaccines for everyone.

By vaccinating just the people most at risk — the people who work with chickens and the caregivers — we can prevent it from becoming transmissible among humans. Then it doesn”t matter what it does in chickens.”

Please remember that, despite the fantastic headlines and projections of MILLIONS of deaths, the H5N1 bird flu virus killed a mere 257 people worldwide since late 2003. As unfortunate as those deaths are, 257 deaths worldwide from any disease, over the course of five years, simply does not constitute an emergency worthy of much attention, let alone fear!

Honestly, your risk of being killed by a lightning strike in the last five years was about 2,300 percent higher than your risk of contracting and dying from the bird flu.6 I”m not kidding! In just one year (2004), more than 1,170 people died from lighting strikes, worldwide.7

So please, as the numbers of confirmed swine flu cases are released, keep a level head and don”t let fear run away with your brains.

So is the Swine Flu Getting More or Less Dangerous?

On Sunday, April 26, The Independent reported that more than 1,000 people had contracted the swine flu virus in Mexico, 8 but by the afternoon that same day, Mexican President Calderon declared that more than two-thirds of the 1,300 thought to have contracted the disease had been given a clean bill of health and sent home.9

Additionally, the number of actual confirmed cases appears to be far lower than reported in many media outlets, leading me to believe that many reporters are interchanging the terms “suspected cases” and “confirmed cases.”

Interestingly Mexico is the ONLY country in the world where someone has actually died from this disease.Mexico has reported 159 fatalities in flu-like cases in recent days, seven of which have been confirmed as swine flu. Another 19 patients have been confirmed as having swine flu but surviving. Although some insiders at WHO believe these numbers are seriously inflated and could be as low as single digits.
By contrast, the United States has had 91 confirmed cases, five hospitalizations and no deaths from US Citizens. On April 29th CNN reported the first swine fatality in the US, however this was actually a child from Mexico that died in Texas.

According to the World Health Organization”s Epidemic and Pandemic Alert and Response site; as of April 27, there are:

* 91 laboratory confirmed cases in U.S. — 0 deaths (reported by CDC as of April 30)
* 26 confirmed cases in Mexico — 7 deaths
* 6 confirmed cases in Canada — 0 deaths
* 1 confirmed case in Spain — 0 deaths

Additionally, nearly all suspected new cases have been reported as mild.

Personally, I am highly skeptical. It simply doesn”t add up to a real pandemic.

But it does raise serious questions about where this brand new, never before seen virus came from, especially since it cannot be contracted from eating pork products, and has never before been seen in pigs, and contains traits from the bird flu — and which, so far, only seems to respond to Tamiflu. Are we just that lucky, or… what?

Your Fear Will Make Some People VERY Rich in Today”s Crumbling Economy

According to the Associated Press at least one financial analyst estimates up to $388 million worth of Tamiflu sales in the near future10 — and that”s without a pandemic outbreak.

More than half a dozen pharmaceutical companies, including Gilead Sciences Inc., Roche, GlaxoSmithKline and other companies with a stake in flu treatments and detection, have seen a rise in their shares in a matter of days, and will likely see revenue boosts if the swine flu outbreak continues to spread.

As soon as Homeland Security declared a health emergency, 25 percent — about 12 million doses — of Tamiflu and Relenza treatment courses were released from the nation”s stockpile. However, beware that the declaration also allows unapproved tests and drugs to be administered to children. Many health- and government officials are more than willing to take that chance with your life, and the life of your child. But are you?

Remember, Tamiflu went through some rough times not too long ago, as the dangers of this drug came to light when, in 2007, the FDA finally began investigating some 1,800 adverse event reports related to the drug. Common side effects of Tamiflu include:

* Nausea
* Vomiting
* Diarrhea
* Headache
* Dizziness
* Fatigue
* Cough

All in all, the very symptoms you”re trying to avoid.

More serious symptoms included convulsions, delirium or delusions, and 14 deaths in children and teens as a result of neuropsychiatric problems and brain infections (which led Japan to ban Tamiflu for children in 2007). And that”s for a drug that, when used as directed, only reduces the duration of influenza symptoms by 1 to 1 ½ days, according to the official data.

But making matters worse, some patients with influenza are at HIGHER risk for secondary bacterial infections when on Tamiflu. And secondary bacterial infections, as I mentioned earlier, was likely the REAL cause of the mass fatalities during the 1918 pandemic!

Where did This Mysterious New Animal-Human Flu Strain Come From?

Alongside the fear-mongering headlines, I”ve also seen increasing numbers of reports questioning the true nature of this virus. And rightfully so.

Could a mixed animal-human mutant like this occur naturally? And if not, who made it, and how was it released?

Not one to dabble too deep in conspiracy theories, I don”t have to strain very hard to find actual facts to support the notion that this may not be a natural mutation, and that those who stand to gain have the wherewithal to pull off such a stunt.

Just last month I reported on the story that the American pharmaceutical company Baxter was under investigation for distributing the deadly avian flu virus to 18 different countries as part of a seasonal flu vaccine shipment. Czech reporters were probing to see if it may have been part of a deliberate attempt to start a pandemic; as such a “mistake” would be virtually impossible under the security protocols of that virus.

The H5N1 virus on its own is not very airborne. However, when combined with seasonal flu viruses, which are more easily spread, the effect could be a potent, airborne, deadly, biological weapon. If this batch of live bird flu and seasonal flu viruses had reached the public, it could have resulted in dire consequences.

There is a name for this mixing of viruses; it”s called “reassortment,” and it is one of two ways pandemic viruses are created in the lab. Some scientists say the most recent global outbreak — the 1977 Russian flu — was started by a virus created and leaked from a laboratory.

Another example of the less sterling integrity of Big Pharma is the case of Bayer, who sold millions of dollars worth of an injectable blood-clotting medicine to Asian, Latin American, and some European countries in the mid-1980s, even though they knew it was tainted with the AIDS virus.

So while it is morally unthinkable that a drug company would knowingly contaminate flu vaccines with a deadly flu virus such as the bird- or swine flu, it is certainly not impossible. It has already happened more than once.

But there seems to be no repercussions or hard feelings when industry oversteps the boundaries of morality and integrity and enters the arena of obscenity. Because, lo and behold, which company has been chosen to head up efforts, along with WHO, to produce a vaccine against the Mexican swine flu?

Baxter!11 Despite the fact that ink has barely dried on the investigative reports from their should-be-criminal “mistake” against humanity.

According to other sources,12 a top scientist for the United Nations, who has examined the outbreak of the deadly Ebola virus in Africa, as well as HIV/AIDS victims, has concluded that the current swine flu virus possesses certain transmission “vectors” that suggest the new strain has been genetically-manufactured as a military biological warfare weapon.

The UN expert believes that Ebola, HIV/AIDS, and the current A-H1N1 swine flu virus are biological warfare agents.

In addition, Army criminal investigators are looking into the possibility that disease samples are missing from biolabs at Fort Detrick — the same Army research lab from which the 2001 anthrax strain was released, according to a recent article in the Fredrick News Post.13 In February, the top biodefense lab halted all its research into Ebola, anthrax, plague, and other diseases known as “select agents,” after they discovered virus samples that weren”t listed in its inventory and might have been switched with something else.

Factory Farming Maybe Source of Swine Flu

Another theory as to the cause of Swine Flu might be factory farming. In the United States, pigs travel coast to coast. They can be bred in North Carolina, fattened in the corn belt of Iowa, and slaughtered in California.

While this may reduce short-term costs for the pork industry, the highly contagious nature of diseases like influenza (perhaps made further infectious by the stresses of transport) needs to be considered when calculating the true cost of long-distance live animal transport.

The majority of U.S. pig farms now confine more than 5,000 animals each. With a group of 5,000 animals, if a novel virus shows up it will have more opportunity to replicate and potentially spread than in a group of 100 pigs on a small farm.

With massive concentrations of farm animals within which to mutate, these new swine flu viruses in North America seem to be on an evolutionary fast track, jumping and reassorting between species at an unprecedented rate.

Add comment April 30, 2009 thebreastdiva

AACR: Green Tea Blocks Activity of Cancer Drug

* Medical News from
AACR: American Association for Cancer Research Meeting

By Michael Smith, North American Correspondent, MedPage Today
Published: April 20, 2009
Reviewed by Zalman S. Agus, MD; Emeritus Professor
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. Earn CME/CE credit
for reading medical news
DENVER, April 20 — Some cancer patients who take green tea to fight the disease may have it backward: the popular dietary supplement actually blocks the effect of bortezomib (Velcade) and similar anticancer drugs, a researcher said here.
Action Points

* Explain to interested patients that there is wide interest in the potential anticancer effects of green tea extracts, so that many cancer patients self-medicate with them.

* Note that this study suggests that — at least when cancer is being treated with bortezomib (Velcade) — such use is contraindicated.

* Note that this study was published as an abstract and presented orally at a conference. These data and conclusions should be considered to be preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Green tea supplements are being widely investigated for possible anticancer effects and many patients already self-medicate with them, according to Axel Schönthal, Ph.D., of the University of Southern California.

But if they’re also taking bortezomib — a proteasome inhibitor used in multiple myeloma — green tea supplements can ensure that the drug is ineffective, Dr. Schönthal said at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research here.

“We expected the opposite — that it would enhance the therapeutic effect of bortezomib,” Dr. Schönthal said.

The implication of the findings, he said, is that physicians should tell patients taking the drug that green tea supplements are completely contraindicated, although “one cup probably would not be harmful.”

Bortezomib, approved in 2003, blocks the activity of proteasomes, cellular complexes that break down proteins when they are no longer needed. Over time, the blockage leads to apoptosis by preventing the breakdown of pro-apoptotic factors.

In the green tea-bortezomib drama, the main villain of the piece, Dr. Schönthal said, is a polyphenol compound called epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG).

Using nuclear magnetic resonance, he and colleagues showed that this polyphenol — and others in green tea having so-called 1,2-benzene-diol moieties — chemically interacted with bortezomib, which is based on boronic acid.

The two compounds formed stable cyclic boronate adducts that were unable to act as a proteasome inhibitor, he said.

Because of that missing first step, in multiple myeloma cells treated with both green tea and bortezomib, the drug did not cause endoplasmic reticulum stress or caspase activation, and did not induce tumor cell death, he said.

The researchers found the same effect when they treated mice — which had been given human tumors — with both substances, he said. With just bortezomib, the tumors underwent necrosis and shrank.

But when both compounds were present, the tumors continued to grow.

The report illustrates the potential for drug interactions in patients who turn to alternative medicine, said Peter Shields, M.D., a clinical oncologist at Washington’s Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center.

“Americans love alternative therapies,” he said, and in many cases physicians don’t have enough data to counsel patients on which are safe and which should be avoided.

Green tea, he said, is a “challenging thing — the human studies are all not supportive of each other.”

That said, in this narrow situation — a single a single drug indicated for only a few diseases — Dr. Shields said he now has some data that might allow him to give patients some guidance.

Dr. Schönthal said various studies have shown that humans taking green tea supplements can very easily reach the doses that he and colleagues used in their research.

Another issue, he said, is that patients drinking green tea may find themselves feeling better, because the supplement blocks the side effects of bortezomib, too.

“So then they consume more [supplements],” he said, progressively blunting the benefits of the anticancer drug.

Researchers did not see the effect in proteasome inhibitors that aren’t based on boronic acid, such as nelfinavir (Viracept), Dr. Schönthal said. (Nelfinavir is best known as a protease inhibitor used to treat HIV, but recent studies have shown it also blocks proteasome activity.)

A peer-reviewed version of the study appeared in February in the journal Blood.

Dr. Schönthal did not report any external support for the study or any conflicts.

Primary source: American Association for Cancer Research
Source reference:
Schönthal AH, et al “Green tea products extinguish therapeutic efficacy of proteasome inhibitors, such as bortezomib, in vitro and in vivo” AACR 2009; Abstract 819.

Add comment April 25, 2009 thebreastdiva

AACR: Walnuts Prevent Breast Cancer in Mice

By Michael Smith, North American Correspondent, MedPage Today
Published: April 21, 2009
Reviewed by Dori F. Zaleznik, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston.

DENVER, April 21 — A couple of handfuls of walnuts a day could prevent breast cancer, a researcher said here.
Action Points

* Explain to interested patients that this study looked at the effect of walnuts in the diet of mice that were genetically engineered to develop breast cancer.

* Add that the study found a clear benefit, but caution that more research is needed before the results can be applied to humans.

* Note that this study was published as an abstract and presented at a conference. These data and conclusions should be considered to be preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.

The finding comes from studies in transgenic mice, but should also apply to people, according to Elaine Hardman, Ph.D., of Marshall University School of Medicine in Huntington, W.Va.

“It is clear that walnuts contribute to a healthy diet that can reduce breast cancer,” Dr. Hardman said at the annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research.

“I think any time (to eat walnuts) could be beneficial, even after diagnosis,” Dr. Hardman told reporters.

In the study she’s reporting here, mice engineered to be susceptible to breast cancer were fed small amounts of walnuts in their diet and were compared to similar animals that didn’t get the nuts.

At the age of six months, 100% of these animals usually have cancer, she said, but the incidence of malignancy was reduced by half in the animals who got the walnuts.

At the same time, in mice that got cancer anyway, the rate of growth of the tumor was reduced by 50%, compared with the growth rate of tumors in the control animals, she said.

In an earlier study — in which tumors were implanted in mice — the results were similar in terms of growth rate, she said.

In the current study, the time to the appearance of the first tumor was three weeks slower for the walnut-fed animals than it was for the control mice.

That’s about a 15% delay, she said. In women, that would translate to about a nine-year delay.

The mice were fed about four-tenths of a gram of walnuts a day, which for people would be about two ounces a day — or two handfuls, Dr. Hardman said.

But Dr. Hardman’s suggestion that humans eat more walnuts is going too far, according to Peter Shields, M.D., of Washington’s Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Such a leap is “outrageous” without more study, Dr. Shields said.

“We gave beta-carotene supplements to people based on animal and some [preliminary] human studies suggesting they reduce lung cancer,” he said.

“When we did the study in humans, smokers given beta-carotene got more lung cancer,” he said.

Dr. Shields was referring to pivotal studies, conducted in the 1990s, of the effects of beta-carotene supplements on some 29,000 male smokers in Finland. They found that, compared with patients taking a placebo, those who consumed a daily beta-carotene supplement had a 18% higher rate of lung cancer.

Dr. Hardman’s work, he said, “is a nice study that calls for more research. There needs to be a lot more understood” about how walnuts might prevent breast tumors.

“It might be worth it for epidemiologists to look at people,” he added.

The value — or risk — of various foods is a common theme at this meeting. In other research:

* Scientists at the University of Minnesota School of Public Health said eating well done and very well done meat may be associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer. A preference for very well done steak was associated with a 95% increase in the risk of the disease, although the hazard ratio just missed statistical significance.
* For people with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, a habit of drinking wine in the years before diagnosis may reduce the risk of death and relapse, according to researchers at Yale School of Public Health. The scientists said the finding may be controversial and needs to be replicated, but wine drinkers had 76% five-year survival compared with 68% of non-wine drinkers, while disease-free survival was 70% and 65% respectively.

The researchers did not report support or conflicts.

Primary source: American Association for Cancer Research
Source reference:
Ion G, et al “Walnut consumption decreases mammary gland tumor incidence, multiplicity and growth in the C(3)1Tag transgenic mouse” AACR 2009; Abstract LB-247.

Add comment April 25, 2009 thebreastdiva

Don’t become a sad statistic

If you have a job or are on a fixed income, the following facts should concern you. Nobody wants to believe that they will have to retire on a poverty level income, but most of us will.

In fact over 90% of Americans …regardless of income level….will retire with an income that is below poverty level. Ask yourself, if you continue to work at your present job and don’t get laid off, in five years will your financial situation be any better than it is now?

Think about it. If you don’t make any positive changes now….then, you cannot expect any positive changes now or 5 years from now! Right? Will you be able to save enough money to live your dreams while you are still young and healthy?

The following are some FACTS:

1. By age 65 only 2% of the population is financially independent, 23% are still working, and 75% retire on a near poverty level income, dependent on relatives, social security or a small pension.

2. Over 70% of all Americans are living from pay check to pay check.

3. The average 50 year old person has only $2,300 in savings (about a one day stay in a hospital).

4. More than 80% of the personal bankruptcies in the U.S. could have been avoided if household income could have been increased by just $300 per month.

5. 93% of the men at age 65 who have failed financially said it was because of a lack of a definite plan.

6. 80% of all people making over $50,000 per year own their own business

7. Tax laws are designed to provide benefits to business owners, not employees.

8. Over 80% of America’s work force beyond the age of 35 realize that their present job will not lead them to financial independence.

9. Over 3.8 million corporate executives, administrators and managers lost their jobs in the 1980`s. 2,650 people lost their jobs each day in the 1990`s. Today and every day for the last 6 months we’ve lost 20,000 jobs a day on average. Did you hear me 20,000 jobs per day. There is no longer any security in working for someone else.

10. People want out of the “Rat Race”. The franchise industry use to be booming but now it’s a bust. People are risking everything they have including their home equity, savings, etc. to find something that will work.

Network marketing is a $15 billion dollar a year industry. It is a global phenomenon. Many Fortune 500 companies now offer products through network marketing because it is considered “the wave of the future.”

Billionaire John Paul Getty said there are three things that are necessary to accumulate financial wealth:

1. Own your own business
2. Offer a product or service everyone wants and everyone needs.
3. Have a system that allows you to duplicate yourself through others. That’s leverage!

Paul Getty said, “I would rather earn 1% of 100 people’s efforts than 100% of my own efforts.”

People want to take control of their financial future and are searching for the right vehicle to achieve financial independence. Don’t let yourself become a sad statistic. Take control of your financial future.

The Networkers Club has an exciting opportunity and products that everyone wants and needs. It is a business opportunity for only $16 a month, and is designed to save you money on many things you regularly buy each and every month. You can save 1000’s a year, and earn up to $6546 each and every month in referral bonuses just for TELLING ALL YOUR FRIENDS! You can learn more at http://Only16Dollars.com

We’re looking for team members who want to
Save Money and Earn Money,
WORLDWIDE with the Networkers Club!
http://Only16Dollars.com
Bart & Debbie Mormino

Add comment April 24, 2009 thebreastdiva
Tags: ,

Is Drywall the Next Chinese Import Scandal?

from Dr. Mercola:

Hundreds of homeowners are alleging that toxic levels of chemical pollutants like sulfur are being emitted by contaminated drywall made in Chinese factories. Class-action lawsuits have been filed in Florida, California, Louisiana and Alabama. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission is investigating the complaints.

During the recent U.S. housing-construction boom, builders were desperate for materials, and drywall was especially in demand. Before 2005, drywall imports to the U.S. from China were negligible; since 2006, however, more than 550 million pounds of it has been shipped to the U.S. — primarily to Florida. The drywall was used to build more than 60,000 homes in at least a dozen states.

Drywall is made from gypsum, a soft mineral, that is pressed between thick paperboard. Plaintiffs’ attorneys say the allegedly toxic drywall material probably originated in at least one gypsum mine in China.

The problem came to light last year as homeowners began commiserating on the Internet about rotten-egg smells in their houses and rashes of nosebleeds and other ailments. At the same time, air-conditioner repairmen began complaining to builders about copper-coil corrosion in newly built houses. The air-conditioning companies concluded it was caused by high levels of airborne sulfur and moldy toxins. Wires in outlets, appliances and lamps started corroding as well.

Sources:

Time March 23, 2009

Dr. Mercola’’s Comments Dr. Mercola’s Comments:

More than 60,000 homes across the country, most of them in Florida, contain drywall from China that may be emitting sulfuric odors and exposing homeowners to respiratory health problems, nosebleeds, headaches, insomnia and sore joints, among other complaints.

The emissions are also corroding air conditioning coils and electronic equipment, which is ruining electronics and could pose the risk of electrical fires.

The problem is so severe in South Florida that congressman Rep. Robert Wexler wrote a letter to the state’s governor asking him to declare a state of emergency because the health and safety risks associated with Chinese drywall are similar to the impact of a hurricane or other natural disaster.

Already at least four class-action lawsuits have been filed in Florida and others have been filed in California, Louisiana and Alabama. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission is also investigating the complaints.

A String of Toxic Products from China

China’s economy has been growing at a rate of nearly 10 percent annually for the last 30 years, largely because they are exporting massive amounts of products across the globe.

They’re widely known for producing affordable (cheap) goods, and in recent years have made quite the name for themselves as a producer of toxic goods as well. Aside from this latest revelation of toxic Chinese drywall, the United States has been grappling with a string of toxic disasters from China, which include:

*

Toothpaste and other Chinese-made toiletries that have been found to contain a toxic chemical used to make antifreeze
*

Pet food ingredients laced with toxic melamine
*

Imported livestock quarantined for disease and banned chemical contaminants
*

Catfish fillets from Chinese aquatic farms tainted with bacteria and heavy metals
*

Dried apples preserved with a cancer-causing chemical
*

Mushrooms laced with illegal pesticides

How Can You Tell if Your Home has Chinese Drywall?

Although The Florida Department of Health says tests show levels of emissions from the Chinese drywall pose no “immediate health threat,” affected homeowners are still worried about potential health effects, not to mention the impact on their property values.

Signs that your house may be affected include:

*

The odor of rotten eggs
*

Frequent repairs on your home’s air conditioning system, wiring or pipes
*

Health symptoms including irritated eyes, respiratory problems, nosebleeds and headaches that resolve when you leave your home

According to the Web site of one law firm investigating potential lawsuits against the companies, builders and manufacturers responsible for the Chinese drywall problems, the problem may be related to the presence of iron disulfide (FeS2 pyrite), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbonyl sulfide, sulfur dioxide (SO2), and carbon disulfide (CS2) in the material.

If the Chinese drywall is indeed emitting hydrogen sulfide fumes, it could be a serious problem. The Web site continues:

“Exposure to 50 parts per million of hydrogen sulfide for more than ten minutes can cause extreme irritation. Inhalation of 500 to 1,000 parts per million can cause unconsciousness and death through respiratory paralysis and asphyxiation, according to environmental experts.”

If you suspect your home may be at risk, contact your state’s Department of Health, your home’s builder and also an attorney for help.

Other Toxins to Watch Out for in Your Home

Products from China are not the only ones tainting our houses and office buildings. Any number of potentially toxic substances exist freely around us in our daily lives.

For instance:

*

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are toxic gases emitted from paints, cleansers, air fresheners, vinyl floors, carpets, upholstery fabrics, and much more, can cause cancer and damage to your liver, kidney and central nervous system.

VOCs in the indoor air of new buildings have been found to average 20 to 40 mg per m3. Adverse health effects may begin with exposure at just 10 mg per m3.

*

Certain pressure-treated wood products used for decks and playground equipment are treated with pesticides that contain arsenic.
*

Engineered wood products commonly used to make cabinets, furniture, wall paneling and more emit pollutants such as formaldehyde into your home’s air.
*

Foam furniture padding, mattresses and more contain flame retardants known as PBDEs, which are highly toxic and now showing up in breast milk.

This is truly only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the chemicals floating around most homes and office buildings.

In order for you to be truly healthy, your home needs to supply you with adequate opportunity to rest and relax. It needs to nurture, as it is only through this that you can truly recuperate at the end of the day and recharge with the strength to deal with the next day‘s emotional and physical stresses.

Unfortunately, many are now residing in homes that only add to their chemical loads and emotional stresses.

Is it Possible to Make Your Living Environment Healthier?

You may not be able to build a new “all-natural” home or office for yourself, but you can make small changes to bring more natural and healthy materials into your living spaces by:

*

Filtering your home’s air using a high-quality air purification system like the one we have identified.
*

Redoing a portion of your home with a natural material, such as bamboo flooring.
*

Avoiding all chemical cleansers, air fresheners and detergents, and switching to natural varieties instead.
*

Installing full-spectrum lighting to bring the benefits of natural sunlight indoors.
*

Adding houseplants to your home and office.
*

Getting outside to spend some time in a natural environment as often as possible.

You can also look into Bau-Biologie (German for “Building Biology”).

The Bau-Biologie standard is used in Europe, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand — as a benchmark to professional and independent measurements in houses. The goal is to create an environment as close to nature as possible to best support your physical health and mental well-being.

Related Links:

Dirty Drug Industry Secret: Their Pills are Made in China

Tainted Toothpaste Took an Unchecked Route

10 Dangerous Everyday Things in Your Home

Add comment April 14, 2009 thebreastdiva

Be Your Own Boss for $16 a month

If you, like everyone else, needs an additional source of income these days, you really need to check out The Networkers Club.

The membership benefits of The Networkers Club were only available as a benefit for employees of Unions and organizations for the past 8 years, but now are available to the general public. Not only do our members save money on travel, entertainment and things they’re already buying, but there is also an income opportunity along with the membership benefits.

Your membership will cost you $16 a month. While the money you’ll save is incredible, the income you can generate is even better! The comp plan is a 3×7 matrix, which means each member brings in a minimum of 3 new members. Since the people who brought you in also have a minimum of 3 members, any more than that brought in have to go under their own sponsored people, which in turn fills in the matrix fairly quickly. As your matrix is filling in, you’re quickly earning MUCH more than your $16 membership fees! When your matrix is full, the income is $6546 a month, per spot and you can have more than one!

You can see the comp plan and membership benefits at our website: http://NetworkerBailOut.com or call me for more info at 985-892-5858.

This new networking club has been areal blessing to me! I look very forward to Paying It Forward to YOU!

Add comment March 24, 2009 thebreastdiva

Two Food Additives Found to Have Estrogen-Like Effects

Scientists have developed a fast new method to identify food additives that act as “xenoestrogens” — substances with estrogen-like effects that are stirring international health concerns.

They used the method in a large-scale screening, and discovered two additives with previously unrecognized xenoestrogen effects.

Xenoestrogens have been linked to a range of human health effects, including reduced sperm counts in men and increased risk of breast cancer in women.

The scientists used the new method to search a food additive database of 1,500 substances, and verified that the method could identify xenoestrogens. In the course of that work, they identified two previous unrecognized xenoestrogens — propyl gallate, a preservative used to prevent fats and oils from spoiling, and 4-hexylresorcinol, which is used to prevent discoloration in shrimp and other shellfish.

Dr. Mercola’s Comments:

I’ve written about the dangers of endocrine disruptors such as bisphenol A, PFOA and phthalates many times. I like to consider xenoestrogens fake estrogens but their name literally means “foreign estrogens.” Either way they are synthetic chemicals that mimic natural estrogens, and have been linked to a wide range of human health effects.

There are so many of them, and they’re used in so many common consumer products that trying to avoid them may seem like a fruitless struggle.

For example, you come in contact with hormone disrupting chemicals through:

* Pasteurized dairy, which commonly contains bovine growth hormones
* Soy products, which are loaded with hormone like substances
* Plastics – many of which contain bisphenol A
* Personal care products that contain phthalates
* Cooking with Teflon-coated pots and pans

Now you can add certain food additives to the list – and some very common food additives at that.

Hormone-Mimicking Food Additives Recently Discovered

In the U.S., more than 3,000 substances can be added to foods for the purpose of preservation, coloring, texture, flavor and more. While each of these substances is legal to use, whether or not they are entirely safe for long-term consumption – by themselves or in combination – is a different story altogether.

The analysis published in the journal Chemical Research in Toxicology actually found not just two, but 31 potential estrogen-mimicking food additives during their search.

Of those, propyl gallate was found to act as an antagonist, and 4-hexylresorcinol as a potent transactivator. Antagonists block the binding of an agent at a receptor molecule, and transactivators increase the rate of gene expression. In conclusion the authors’ state:

“Some caution should be issued for the use of propyl gallate and 4-hexylresorcinol as food additives.”

However, I don’t think we’ll see any of them removed from the market any time soon. Propyl gallate, for example, has been used since 1948 as a preservative to stabilize cosmetics, food packaging materials, and foods containing oils and fats. It can also be found in:

* Hair products
* Adhesives and lubricants
* Processed meat products and potato products
* Chicken soup base
* Chewing gum and candy
* Dried milk
* Baked goods, and more

Propyl gallate is frequently used in conjunction with BHA and BHT, which come with their own set of health hazards. These two additives also keep fats and oils from going rancid and are commonly used in processed food products such as cereals and potato chips, even though some studies have found they too, cause cancer in rats.

The other food additive mentioned above, 4-hexylresorcinol, is commonly used as an anti-browning agent in shrimp and other shellfish.

But it’s also used as a starting material to produce synthetic catecholamines, which have important physiological effects as neurotransmitters and hormones (such as epinephrine, adrenaline, norepinephrine, and dopamine).

Additionally, you can find it in common consumer products such as:

* Pharmaceutical acne treatments
* Anti-dandruff shampoo
* Sunscreen lotions
* Antiseptic mouthwashes
* Skin wound cleansers
* Throat lozenges

Potential Health Dangers of Propyl Gallate

In addition to being an endocrine disrupter based on this latest analysis, the results in a previous study by the National Toxicology Program (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) showed that propyl gallate caused various types of cancer and other health problems in rats, including:

* Thyroid tumors in male rats
* Rare brain tumors in low-dose females
* Prostate inflammation
* Mostly benign tumors of the preputial gland (glands that produce pheromones)
* Pancreatic tumors
* Adrenal gland tumors in low-dose males

As you can see, in some instances the health effect only showed up in the low-dose groups but not in the high-dose groups, and only in either males or females – a perfect example of just how little anyone really knows about how these types of chemicals might affect your body, or the body of an infant, for example.

Potential Health Hazards of Common Anti-Browning Agent

The anti-browning agent 4-Hexylresorcinol is applied to shrimp and other crustacean seafood to prevent the development of black spots which may occur naturally.

A toxicology study by the School of Biological Sciences, University of Surrey, England, discovered that 260 mg/kg was lethal to all cats used in the study. Granted, that is a very high dose; however, based on their data, the researchers also concluded that 4-Hexylresorcinol was carcinogenic in both the 13-week and 2-year studies, and also caused a high incidence of nephropathy in mice (an autoimmune disease that affects your kidneys).

A 1984 study determined the probable lethal dose for humans to be anything above 500 mg/kg.

How to Protect Your Family

If you have children xenoestrogens are clearly something you will want to avoid. Here are some measures you can take to protect you and your children from common toxic substances that could cause them to go into puberty more than a decade before they were designed to:

* Store your food in glass containers whenever possible, as it is the most inert container you can use.
* Only use natural cleaning products in your home. Most health food stores will have these available or you can search online for them.
* Buy and eat, as much as possible, organic foods, especially mik which is frequently contaminated with bovine growth hormone.
* Avoid processed foods.
* Avoid artificial food additives of all kind, including artificial sweeteners and MSG.
* Avoid all varieties of unfermented soy.
* Switch to natural brands of toiletries, including shampoo, toothpaste, antiperspirants and cosmetics. Same sources as above for these, either your local health food store or you can search online.
* Review Our Stolen Future, probably the best resource on this topic

Add comment March 19, 2009 thebreastdiva
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Previous Posts Next Posts